Tuesday, December 06, 2005

presentation 02: conclusion

It all began with one camera: the Holga camera. Last winter session, to be precise. With this simple toy camera, I discovered the art of the double exposure and the powerful process of shooting a continuous strip of film, in which I control the advancement but cannot control the superimposition and juxtaposition which inevitably develop. Almost immediately, I started using the camera in the transformation of an existing place. This twenty dollar toy has changed how I document and transform, and how I am able to construct translations.

Since working with this camera, I have begun to question how different mediums can capture the same place differently. I have been studying the nature of multiple perspectives, and used fragmenting and layering as subtractive and additive methods of form generation to study specific places. I have investigated how to construct simultaneity by using the same image which holds different scales and layerings of space. The photographic image became a transformation of its surroundings, and a documentation and translation of the original context.

The Holga was not exactly the beginning. USC architecture was. Studying place and space is not a new endeavor. Documentation, transformation, and construction are the means I have been working with since I started my architecture education. It all began eight years ago with the first day of my undergraduate program. Looking at the world around me—and responding to existing context—were approaches I investigated time and again. I did not start from scratch, but responded to a specific sites and programs. In school, I learned about the importance of surroundings and the nature of space and place in buildings and landscape projects. I was profoundly influenced by how people navigate buildings, how they intuitively react to their surroundings, and how they are influenced by the places they inhabit.

Through those projects, I created spaces dealing with the total inhabited experience. I saw the power of constructing an experiential environment and building space. During that process, I became aware that a building is a collection of multiple vantage points and simultaneous moments people experience through circulation and progression.

The vocabulary of discussion and evaluation of my work stems from the architectural studio. I do not have to utilize concrete or drafting tools to build space. I have continued to build, using photographic setups, exhibitions, or interactive book works as the methods of achieving spatial construction. This thesis inquiry delves into the nature of construction and construction, the process of building space in a two dimensional realm, and the endeavor of creating interactive objects. The means have changed, but the process is similar and the goals are the same.

Thursday, December 01, 2005

presentation 02: wall installation






Wednesday, November 30, 2005

presentation 02: multiple dimensions

The decentered media reality that we experience, with its fragmentation, multiplicity and simultenaity is helping to deepen the sense there is no correct or true model of the self. There is no longer one absolute reality, but the possibility of multiple realities, each one as real and as artificial as the next. Dan Friedman

MULTIPLICITY
I realized that although I have a lot of interests which are interrelated—space, time, emotion, absence of presence, visceral form—the underlying link among them seems to be the multiplicity and multidimensionality of singular parts. This construction and deconstruction of individual elements into multiple, multidimensional wholes ties various studies together. I work with multiples: the many instead of the one. Multiples are more exciting than singular instances. Whether using a camera that takes four almost identical fragments, or a camera which double exposes moments on a continuous film strip, I like the repetition of parts. Working with fragments and with layers, I am cutting things apart and putting them together in chance fashion. Seeing new juxtapositions which result out of these reconfigurations creates new meaning, and develops unexpected relationships.

Although I am utilizing ordering, I am not specifically focused on sequence. I am not constructing a regimented sequential narrative, but rather, working with kits of parts which can be reconfigured in play and investigation. These multiples do not necessarily construct a meta narrative. They exist in their multiplicity, in the many, to show the minor differences, to serve as points of comparison, to construct wholes made up of individual parts. They are interactive in the tangible sense of the word: interactive, changeable and reconfigurable to allow the user to construct their own variations.

Sequence and Seriality differ. Sequence presumes an additive construction which results in a “greater result.” The sum of the parts usually constructs a narrative, and transcends its loosely bound moments. Seriality entails the simultaneity of individual moments next to each other. It allows for juxtaposition and multiple vantage points, a parallax, multi perspective view. It is still divided though, and not mean to make up a new, cohesive whole. There is no necessary build up, climax or resoltion. It is about subtle variation of similar parts and simultaneous sameness.

Like a dictionary organizes interrelated words and exists in its entirety without a specific beginning or end or like a building sometimes exists with several circulation corridors that link separate rooms, I create book objects which are continuous yet not sequential. There is no pre regimented start or finish. Just as in that building, there is no one prescribed path, one correct route. The circulation path contains multiple perspectives, and depending on which path someone takes constructs different experiences.

NON ORDERED ORDER
Paradoxically, my work has a structure but a structure that is not regimented. The pages might be bound into one book, but they are flippable in different configuration to alter the juxtapositions between them. Maybe, the book is in an accordion book format, but there is no narrative beginning or end. The pages are all separate panels bound into one strip, that can be flipped in different alignments. Or, my book is not bound at all, and the loose pages—black dots which have been cut out of panels, or wax books pages which are infinitely variable in their sequence—the individual pages have no particular order. Or, I study, form that can never be frozen in the same state due to materials which are in constant flux. In the book that is made up of honey, every time someone plays with it, the book changes form. Utilizing such mutable, dynamic materials, I study new juxtapositions, chance alignments which give new continuous configurations. The new piece is contextual to every viewing; it is different every time.

MULTIDIMENSIONALITY
They projects this semester also have a multidimensionality to them: a front and a back, a foreground, middle ground, and background in the perspective sense. I approach a flat page in terms of space. I incorporate space within two dimensional media. Although some of my projects have incorporated installation formats, I am more drawn to the “book work” as means of expression. The challenge of translating three dimensions to two dimensions, and the challenge of the unflat page, excite me.

Wednesday, October 12, 2005

presentation 01: inbetween

blurred boundaries
connections
relationships
intersections
overlaps

Studying the relationship between two things is a method for studying the inbetween. Does anything exist discretely in the world? Our language and our vision are sewn with relationships—relationships between things as they exist right now, relationships between what we have seen and what we anticipate we will see next. There are some who claim that relationships between things form life itself. The unnamed territory between discrete states is the inbetween that occurs naturally in life, but is often overlooked by graphic designers. MARTIN VENEZKY

What is the moment between observation and creation? This inbetween area—between construction and deconstruction, between revealing and concealing, between whole and fragment, between 3D and 2D, between visible and invisible, between real and unreal—will be the focus of my studies.

I am interested in this “space between,” the juxtaposition of two moments—a sunrise and its light transforming the clouds, the point where the ocean and the horizon meet, an adobe wall overlapped by a sign—to construct poetic instances. What happens when individual layers are mixed and remixed, the images becoming intertwined into new constructions? The inbetween is the space of undefined boundaries, which allow fluid connections and relationships to be established.

Last year, I became interested in representing emotive feelings through fragments of an existing reality—texture, color, and detail—and in pursing this type of image making to see what kind of realm I could construct. After reflecting upon my proposal, my interest narrowed into conveying the felt essence of a place through its isolated moments and constructing an evocative new space. Space became the goal, as most of the work I am interested in contains dimension and depth. The translation of the spatial world remains very spatial in my work; it retains a sense of the original dimensions it occupied. The work is not quite 3D and not quite 2D—it is a world of depth and dimension on a flattened page.

The goal of both the additive and the subtractive methods of form generation is to create an overall experience rather than an image on the page. Fragments of existing reality will be used to construct sensation from what exists but goes unnoticed. First, I plan to observe and document the natural and man-made world. The art of the moment—noticing a particular instance which I want to capture and transform—will create an awareness of the wonder of the world that I see for others to notice. Subsequently, I plan on investigating subtractive and additive forms of image making—fragmenting as well as layering the original materials—to play with deconstructing and constructing “the unreal.”

In the Holga camera, moments where the overlap occurs are poetic spaces. They are instances where two “real” worlds come together and combine into one to construct an unexpected “unreal” result. I am interested in this “space between,” the juxtaposition of two moments—a sunrise and its light transforming the clouds, the point where the ocean and the horizon meet, an adobe wall overlapped by a sign—to construct these poetic instances. What happens when these layers are mixed and remixed, the images becoming intertwined into new constructions? What is the space between the real and the unreal?

QUESTIONS
The questions from my last proposal which still affect my areas of interest involve the nature of form being content. Through reduction and through the peeling of representation layer by layer, decontextualized images are reinterpreted based only on their formal qualities. During this translation, several process oriented questions arise. How do subtractive and additive modes of creation differ and when is either appropriate? How can I use fragmentation as a method for taking what is in front of me and isolating and reinterpreting it? How can I push layering as an additive form of space generation to produce discoveries through secondary juxtapositions? What is about the point of intersection—of two things coming together—which captures my interest?

INSPIRATION
art of travel: express the wonder of the world
I try to capture the unexplainable thing in nature that makes me feel that the world is far beyond my understanding. To understand it, I must put it into form: to find the feeling of the infinity on the horizon line or just over the next hill. GEORGIA O’KEEFE
I believe that travel is the best source for inspiration and awareness. During the past summer, I journeyed through the American Southwest and collected many fragmented memories. Looking closely at the desert, I realized that what appeared to be a vacant land was, in fact, teeming with life. This strange landscape was a wonderland of fantastic flora, fauna, and intriguing civilizations interwoven within the colorful and dramatic displays of nature. Opposing dualities created intense thresholds of experience: barren rocky landscapes juxtaposed against brilliant blue skies and ancient pueblos perched along the cliffs. I found inspiration not at the Grand Canyon, as expected, but in a wall of a pueblo highlighted by the afternoon sun cresting over the adobe. Moments which I experienced—landforms, botanical fragments, brilliant skies, vernacular ephemera— were captured on film to be then utilized in future projects. Branches of trees, shadows of cacti, sunsets over a chain link fence: all were moments of my travel which I want to reinterpret.

INFLUENCES
architecture
An architectural education provided the foundation for my current interests and endeavors. I have been influenced by architects who create buildings that transcend visual space to touch upon the senses, and create sensation through form. I learned that tangible materials can represent intangible ideas, and that materials can construct feelings. Through the formal expression of physical walls and materials, I attempted to create a “sensational experience” for the inhabitants of the space. Whether dealing with ideas of light, sequencing of spaces, or site influences, I practiced conveying abstract concepts through tangible built forms, influencing the user’s perception of the space. Utilizing form as sensation, I tried to move the audience without speaking a word.

trance music
I am inspired by certain trance DJs who use layers of musical sequences in their songs to build up aural narratives. Techno Trance music is usually layered with numerous tunes, which are simultaneously isolated and unified. Certain songs, like DJ Tiesto’s Goureyella and Destination, have several distinct melodies which weave together throughout the song. These melodies are individual threads with their own stories and own orders which are mixing and combining together to harmonize in particular instances. They go apart or come together to build up crescendo. This crescendo and the resulting fall off are necessary components in building up the sequence. There are no words in most of these songs: only abstract rhythm is used to construct a particular sequence. The result is a very emotional reaction in the listeners of the music. The music is felt and listeners respond on an intuitive level. This felt sensation is a good metaphor for the state I am trying to achieve through distinct fragments which weave together and intersect at certain points.

Likewise, when the DJ mixes and combines two songs together, the time between two distinct songs can be the most interesting and evocative part of the sequence. As Martin Venezky notes in his monograph, “Borrowing from radio jocks, I explored the segues between tracks. The ending of every piece of music approached with uncertainty and tension, but that edge between tracks, properly handled, could be an exhilarating moment.” The poetic gap between songs is a temporarily constructed track, inspired by the intersection of two distinct melodies, different every time. The resonance between two parts is precarious and continuously shifting. They are intertwining in such a way that both can be heard, yet either can be picked out and followed. The intersection of the rhythms in these techno songs can be likened to formal explorations where two different forms are coming in and out of focus; through their mix, they are constructing a new form.

surrealists: space-time universe
The surrealist artists suspended conscious control to produce an expression of the unconscious mind. Certain artists, such as Max Ernst, worked with collage because the technique—the assembling of an artwork from fragments of pictures and texts—echoed the unconscious mind’s creation of a dream from scattered images. According to Ernst, the dream is made up of collected and random fragments that are derived from reality. Using these collected fragments, he transported the viewer from the waking world of commonsense to a surreal dream land. Free association—pairing words and images that did not necessarily go together—demanded that the viewer figure out his own response to the piece. The intersection of the images and the text—the form and its narration—allowed the viewer to draw his own conclusions. The relationship between object and subject—reality and fiction—was reinvented and reinterpreted.

As the surrealist artists made an analogy between the surreal space-time universe and the bizarre world of their dreams and fantasies, I will try to create “unreal” montages based on real places and details. To create such “automatic” work, the process of form generation will be derived from chance operations and happy accidents. Working off the computer with analog Holga photography, with paint and with ink rather than digital printout, my mind will be able to express and reflect through tangible production. Different modes of representation will depict reality differently: photography and painting will showcase alternate aspects of the place. The work can delve into illusory space, mediating the 3D world into 2D representations.

Momix and Cirque du Soleil: choreography as fantasyscape
I recently had the good fortune of seeing Momix’s Opus Cactus, which is a dance performance about the American southwest. The show displayed a powerful, poetic choreography about the desert I was so enchanted with. It exploded with a sense of the magic, danger, sensuality, quirkiness, humor and beauty that uncovered the hidden world. Drawing from the whole lexicon of arts—gymnastics, acrobatics, body surfing, pole vaulting, the aerial arts, ballet, and human puppetry—the director conjured 19 desert scenes and devised such stunning imagery that viewers would never think of the desert in the same way again. I hope to create a similar experience through the lens of graphic design: an evocative choreography of narration and sensation inspired by the land of enchantment.

Upon considering visceral dance performance, I realized that shows such as Momix and Cirque du Soleil make applicable case studies as orchestrated experiences which create fantasyscapes. This constructed world of emotion—where human bodies move to evoke imaginary places and experiences—is a sensational journey which teaches numerous lessons about embracing the poetic realm and having illusion tease reality.

METHOD
form explorations: intuitive and self generative
Focus not on making, but making appear that which appears by itself. Beauty silences the mind. Pay attention and let it happen. OCKERSE
Meaning comes from the process of creation and form making. The form generates the idea. My hands start making and they do not quite know what will come next. I have to be aware of what I am constructing and derive meaning from what is occurring. The making reveals my intentions, and I give form to the intuitive thoughts which only then come to the surface.

My working process involves the precarious balance between control and chaos. I am aware that the process of design is the process of discovery and that an experiment is started but the outcome is not known. Despite some failures, every step of the process translates into a learning experience which can be applied to the future projects. The anxiety, the success, the inspiration, the frustration, the failure, and the success become linked together. The longer the process is allowed to continue, the more possibilities are opened up in the unexpected discoveries. Chance occurrences enrich the work more than astute judgment does. There is a degree of planning involved: setting up the experiment, thinking of the content, knowing when to stop and change direction. Yet, most of the fortunate accidents occur when planning lets go, and intuition takes over.

fragments: restitution of wholeness from insiginificant parts
Nothing is less real than realism. Details are confusing. It is only by selection, by elimination, by emphasis, that we get at the real meaning of things. GEORGIA O’KEEFE
I am a collector and an editor of the world around me. I see the world in fragments, in parts. In these isolated moments, I divide the continuum which is playing out in front of my eyes. I translate and transcribe these isolated instances and construct new landscapes from chance juxtapositions and haphazard interactions. Deconstruction and construction are interdependent; at some points I am fragmenting existing conditions; at others, I am building new ones. Like putting together a puzzle from various smaller pieces, I build a new whole from individual parts. Fragments of the natural and vernacular landscape intersect to create a sense of place, a visceral translation and transformation of their surroundings.

Photography is one medium which captures a still from the moving reality in front of it. It frames a moment in time and captures it forever as a fragment clipped from a larger continuum whose boundaries are unknown. The photographer cuts out a portion of what he sees; the painter sees and adds to his blank canvas. That is the difference between painting and photography. The former looks and re-represents through constructing on a white canvas; the latter, captures and transforms an existing moment to reinterpret it.

layers: weaving of intersecting fragments
Life has multiple layers of reality. We see one layer but there are others below the surface. What are the layers of things we don’t see? What do they look like? PHOENIX ART
Each captured moment is a part of a larger whole and is thus a fragment derived away from its context. Layers add dimension to fragments. When layered in space, fragments are intermixed and the added depth situates them in a new dimension of reality. The “picture planes” of views—foreground, middle ground and background—start blending and intermixing.

Boundaries are blurred. Space is constructed when these grounds are mixed and interchanged. Weaving the layers is essential through actual physical intersection: they cannot be merely placed on top of each other, such as two layers in photoshop are falsely “layered.” The actual mixing constructs a point of real influence and exchange. The Holga camera assembles such physical juxtapositions of images. The photographed images are physically combining and interchanging on the surface of the film. One fragment gives way to another fragment, and isolated moments of both come through. Spray paint layering is another method which reveals and conceals simultaneously. It constructs a top layer that obfuscates the image below, while simultaneously revealing a new layer of visual narrative. It acts as a window which frames a particular fragment.

presentation 01: summary

CONTENT
art of the moment | express the wonder of the world from its isolated instances
art of travel
| southwest, horizons, vernacular signs, skies, flora
reflections of reality
| reflections on glass, water, shadows

INFLUENCES
architecture
trance music
surrealists
Cirque du Soleil + Momix
Martin Venezky

METHOD
form explorations
fragments
layers
construction + deconstruction
addition + subtraction
revealing + concealing
intersections

END PRODUCT
construct the unreal from the real
construct feeling form
felt sensation + intuitive reaction
construct poetic space
dimension + depth of 2D form